Posts by admin
Andary Update-Are NFA Amendments Retroactive Under Andary?
Breaking News! Lugo Reversed! Michigan’s Open and Obvious Defense Severely Weakened
Supreme Court Mostly Shuts the Door on “Open and Obvious” as a Motion Defense
In the consolidated cases of Kandil-Elsayed v F & E Oil, Inc, ___ Mich ___ (2023) (Docket No. 162907) and Pinsky v Kroger Co of Michigan, ___ Mich ___ (2023) (Docket No. 163430), the Michigan Supreme Court overruled Lugo v Ameritech Corp, Inc, 464 Mich 512 (2001). In Kandil-Elsayed, ___ Mich at ___; slip op at 2, the Court held that Lugo “was wrongly decided and…
Read MoreAnother Andary Analysis: Supreme Court Affirms Court of Appeals, Mostly
Almost a year ago, the Court of Appeals decided Andary, et al v USAA Casualty Ins Co, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2022) (Docket No. 356487), regarding the application of fee schedules that were added to the No-Fault Act in 2019. In a 2-1, published decision, the Court of Appeals held that the fee schedules…
Read MoreSecrest Wardle – MI PIP Monthly July 2023 Update
Wcisel v Park – Success Story
To access the full article, click here: https://bit.ly/457P88p
Read MoreA2C2 Partnership, LLC v Loch Alpine Improvement Association, Inc. – Success Story
To access the full article, click here: https://bit.ly/3NXzLIz
Read MoreGlover v Nowland – Success Story
To access the full article, click here: https://bit.ly/3JUQYkH
Read MoreRevocations Don’t Rewrite History
The Robinson decision addressed whether a revocation of assignments allows a plaintiff to maintain a PIP claim filed prior to the revocation. The Court of Appeals found that a nunc pro tunc, or retroactive, revocation does not remedy a plaintiff’s lack of standing at the time a lawsuit is filed. To access the full article, click here: https://bit.ly/3O1McEy
Read More