Supreme Court Sets ‘Reasonably Foreseeable Misuse’ Test Under Products Statute
State of the Art 06/06/2018

In Iliades v Dieffenbacher North America Inc, ___ Mich ___ (2018), the Michigan Supreme Court held that the Legislature intended to adopt the common law definition of reasonably foreseeable – specifically, whether the manufacturer was aware, or should have been aware, of the future misuse at the time the product was manufactured.

It was determined that the liability of a manufacturer in a product liability “foreseeable misuse” case hinges on whether the manufacturer was aware, or should have been aware, of the foreseeability for misuse when the product was manufactured.

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2JjuZXh 





Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Margaret Scott, Appointed as Vice Chair of the Oakland County Bar Association’s Criminal Law Committee
In The News 06/29/2018

Secrest Wardle Attorneys, Jim Bradley and Drew Broaddus, Author Negligence Law Article in Michigan Bar Journal
In The News 06/25/2018

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Sarah L. Walburn, Authors Chapter in ICLE Damages Handbook
In The News 05/02/2018

Announcing the April 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 04/23/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Lindsay D. Schmidt to Troy Location
In The News 04/02/2018


Click Here For All Press Releases






Supreme Court issues long-awaited clarification of how “innocent third-party” rule applies in PIP cases, calls for “balancing of equities”
No-Fault Newsline 07/18/2018

Dude, That’s Your Car: “Ownership” is Determined by Right to Use Vehicle and Not Actual Use of Vehicle
No-Fault Newsline 07/16/2018

Michigan Court of Appeals Considers Parent’s Failure to Supervise and Declares Open and Obvious Does Not Apply to Children Under 7-Years Old
Amusement and Leisure 07/12/2018

Awash in PIP Benefits: Court of Appeals Rules that Parked Vehicle Exclusion Does Not Apply to Fall Sustained While Hand-Washing Vehicle (Maintenance)
No-Fault Newsline 07/02/2018

In the Eye of the Beholder: COA holds that lack of graspable handrail on staircase was open and obvious condition, and that artwork falling from wall did not cause slip and fall incident
Boundaries 06/21/2018

View All Publications