Have a Nice Trip! COA Rules Ownership of Property Unnecessary for 'Possession and Control' in Premises Liability Claim
Boundaries 05/03/2018

In the recently published opinion re Finazzo v Fire Equipment Company et al, _ Mich App _ (2018), the MI COA confirmed that “possession and control” for purposes of a premises liability claim does not require the defendant to be the actual owner of the property at the time of the alleged injury. The decision makes clear that a party can be liable under a theory of premises liability regardless of their “ownership” of the subject property. All that is required is possession and control of the location at the time of the claimed injury. Accordingly, the “open and obvious” doctrine has essentially been expanded to any defendant who exercised possession and control, rather than just the landowner.

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2js11B0





Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Margaret Scott, Appointed as Vice Chair of the Oakland County Bar Association’s Criminal Law Committee
In The News 06/29/2018

Secrest Wardle Attorneys, Jim Bradley and Drew Broaddus, Author Negligence Law Article in Michigan Bar Journal
In The News 06/25/2018

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Sarah L. Walburn, Authors Chapter in ICLE Damages Handbook
In The News 05/02/2018

Announcing the April 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 04/23/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Lindsay D. Schmidt to Troy Location
In The News 04/02/2018


Click Here For All Press Releases






Dude, That’s Your Car: “Ownership” is Determined by Right to Use Vehicle and Not Actual Use of Vehicle
No-Fault Newsline 07/16/2018

Michigan Court of Appeals Considers Parent’s Failure to Supervise and Declares Open and Obvious Does Not Apply to Children Under 7-Years Old
Amusement and Leisure 07/12/2018

Awash in PIP Benefits: Court of Appeals Rules that Parked Vehicle Exclusion Does Not Apply to Fall Sustained While Hand-Washing Vehicle (Maintenance)
No-Fault Newsline 07/02/2018

In the Eye of the Beholder: COA holds that lack of graspable handrail on staircase was open and obvious condition, and that artwork falling from wall did not cause slip and fall incident
Boundaries 06/21/2018

Does a landlord out of possession have a duty to inspect the premises? Court of Appeals says “Yes”
Boundaries 06/15/2018

View All Publications