Warning: Reasonable harm expected when it’s so obvious that you must step to avoid it
Boundaries 03/28/2018

In Michigan, it is well settled that a premises owner must maintain his or her property in a reasonably safe condition and has a duty to exercise due care to protect invitees from conditions that might result in injury.  A premises owner does not owe the invitee a duty to warn where the dangers are known to the invitee or are so obvious that the invitee might reasonably be expected to discover the dangers. 

The Court of Appeals applied these well-established principles in Steven Lison and Carol Lison v Costco Wholesale Corporation, unpublished opinion per curiam of the COA, issued 2-27-18.  In Lison, the COA unanimously upheld the trial court’s decision to grant Costco’s MSD on the basis that Costco didn't owe a duty to warn the Plaintiff because the Plaintiff had actual knowledge of the allegedly hazardous condition.

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2Gf6hpq 





Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Shelly Lee Griffin, to Speak at International Association of Special Investigation Units (IASIU) Seminar & Expo on Insurance Fraud
In the News 08/17/2018

Six Secrest Wardle Attorneys Have Been Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2019
In The News 08/16/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Stephanie L. Rutkoske to Troy Location
In The News 08/13/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Partner Elizabeth M. Malone to Troy Location
In The News 08/07/2018

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Margaret Scott, Appointed as Vice Chair of the Oakland County Bar Association’s Criminal Law Committee
In The News 06/29/2018


Click Here For All Press Releases






That’s So Unforeseeable: Abstract Foreseeability Not Enough to Hold Drivers Liable in Negligence Cases
No-Fault Newsline 08/16/2018

Puddle of Yuck: Court of Appeals Affirms Water and Degreaser Puddle in Restaurant Parking Lot is Open and Obvious Condition
Boundaries 08/15/2018

RES JUDICATA – A matter already judged!
No-Fault Newsline 08/14/2018

In, On, or Upon: The Distinction Matters When Determining Priority Under the No-Fault Act
No-Fault Newsline 07/24/2018

Supreme Court issues long-awaited clarification of how “innocent third-party” rule applies in PIP cases, calls for “balancing of equities”
No-Fault Newsline 07/18/2018

View All Publications
 

Troy

2600 Troy Center Drive
P.O Box 5025
Troy, MI 48007-5025
Phone: (248) 851-9500
Fax:(248) 538-1223

Lansing

6639 Centurion Drive
Suite 100
Lansing, MI 48917
Phone: (517) 886-1224
Fax:(517) 886-9284

Grand Rapids

2025 East Beltline S. E.
Suite 600
Grand Rapids, MI 49546
Phone: (616) 285-0143
Fax:(616) 285-0145

Secrest Wardle

© 2018 Secrest Wardle