Warning: Reasonable harm expected when it’s so obvious that you must step to avoid it
Boundaries 03/28/2018

In Michigan, it is well settled that a premises owner must maintain his or her property in a reasonably safe condition and has a duty to exercise due care to protect invitees from conditions that might result in injury.  A premises owner does not owe the invitee a duty to warn where the dangers are known to the invitee or are so obvious that the invitee might reasonably be expected to discover the dangers. 

The Court of Appeals applied these well-established principles in Steven Lison and Carol Lison v Costco Wholesale Corporation, unpublished opinion per curiam of the COA, issued 2-27-18.  In Lison, the COA unanimously upheld the trial court’s decision to grant Costco’s MSD on the basis that Costco didn't owe a duty to warn the Plaintiff because the Plaintiff had actual knowledge of the allegedly hazardous condition.

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2Gf6hpq 

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Sarah L. Walburn, Authors Chapter in ICLE Damages Handbook
In The News 05/02/2018

Announcing the April 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 04/23/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Lindsay D. Schmidt to Troy Location
In The News 04/02/2018

Announcing the March 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 03/23/2018

Executive Partner, Margaret Scott Appointed to the DMC (Detroit Medical Center) Huron Valley-Sinai Hospital Advisory Board
In The News 03/19/2018

Click Here For All Press Releases

Does a landlord out of possession have a duty to inspect the premises? Court of Appeals says “Yes”
Boundaries 06/15/2018

Hitting the Slopes: COA Allows Plaintiff to Amend Complaint to Add Proprietary Function Exemption and Avoid Summary Disposition in Skiing Accident Case
Amusement and Leisure 06/08/2018

Supreme Court Sets ‘Reasonably Foreseeable Misuse’ Test Under Products Statute
State of the Art 06/06/2018

Plaintiff attempts to transform no-fault claim following case evaluation hearing; Court of Appeals holds: not so fast, there’s more than meets the eye
No-Fault Newsline 06/01/2018

One year after the Michigan Supreme Court issues decision in Covenant Medical v State Farm, the retroactive application of Covenant may again be in controversy
No-Fault Newsline 05/30/2018

View All Publications