Entitlement to PIP Benefits: Motor Vehicle Must 'Actively Contribute' to Accident in Order to be Considered “Involved” under MCL 500.3113
No-Fault Newsline 03/02/2018

In Robert Cornelius v Michigan Assigned Claims Plan, an unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals issued on February 27, 2018 (Docket No. 336074), the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s denial of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Disposition, finding that MCL 500.3113 did not bar Plaintiff’s claim for PIP benefits where two collisions constituted separate accidents. While Cornelius is an unpublished opinion and therefore not binding authority, it stands for the proposition that a Court must separately analyze whether each vehicle “actively influenced” the collision in order to determine involvement for purposes of MCL 500.3113(b).

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2F72qq0 





Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Sarah L. Walburn, Authors Chapter in ICLE Damages Handbook
In The News 05/02/2018

Announcing the April 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 04/23/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Lindsay D. Schmidt to Troy Location
In The News 04/02/2018

Announcing the March 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 03/23/2018

Executive Partner, Margaret Scott Appointed to the DMC (Detroit Medical Center) Huron Valley-Sinai Hospital Advisory Board
In The News 03/19/2018


Click Here For All Press Releases






I Saw The (As)Sign(ment): Michigan Court of Appeals Rules Anti-Assignment Provision in No Fault Policy is Unenforceable
No-Fault Newsline 05/08/2018

Have a Nice Trip! COA Rules Ownership of Property Unnecessary for 'Possession and Control' in Premises Liability Claim
Boundaries 05/03/2018

Tee’d Up: Michigan Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Whether Golf Cart Accident is Inherent Risk for Co-Participants in a Round of Golf
Attractions 05/01/2018

Fire in the Home! The Term “Reside” Means “Actual Occupancy” in Fire Loss Case
Safeguards 04/24/2018

Leave Me Out of It: Court of Appeals Favors Contract Enforcement over Judicial Economy and Holds that UIM Claims May Not Be Ripe While Claim on Underlying Policy Still Being Litigated
No-Fault Newsline 04/23/2018

View All Publications