"I think, therefore it is" is insufficient to establish causation.
Boundaries 02/22/2018

In Sava v Newman’s Pub N Grub, Inc., the appellate court ruled that given Plaintiff’s lack of testimony, or circumstantial and material evidence of any presence of ice on the patio, that Plaintiff failed to meet her burden of establishing that Defendant breached a duty and that their breach was the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s slip and fall. Plaintiff’s assumption or speculation that she fell on ice, coupled with witness testimony of the lack of ice, and the above freezing temperatures, did not meet the burden of proof to prove a causal connection between Defendant’s conduct and Plaintiff’s injury.

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2GAmzoK

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Executive Partner Shelly Lee Griffin to Troy Location
In The News 03/13/2018

Driving While Disabled: Using Transportation Service While Physically Capable of Driving is Fraud
No-Fault Newsline 03/05/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Partner Lisa C. Baluha to Troy Location
In The News 02/23/2018

Announcing the Next Episode of Secrest Wardle's "MI PIP Monthly"
In The News 02/22/2018

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Margaret Scott, Appointed to the State Bar of Michigan’s Representative Assembly
In The News 02/21/2018

Click Here For All Press Releases

Where Unstable Porch Gives Rise to Inference of Property Owner’s Negligence, No Evidence of Notice is Required
Boundaries 03/12/2018

COA: "Serious Impairment" is Not a Question of Law
No-Fault Newsline 03/07/2018

Entitlement to PIP Benefits: Motor Vehicle Must 'Actively Contribute' to Accident in Order to be Considered “Involved” under MCL 500.3113
No-Fault Newsline 03/02/2018

Plaintiff’s Motion for Directed Verdict on the Issue of Serious Impairment Properly “Knicked”
No-Fault Newsline 03/01/2018

"I think, therefore it is" is insufficient to establish causation.
Boundaries 02/22/2018

View All Publications