There Is a Difference: No-Fault Insured Claim vs. Statutory Claim
No-Fault Newsline 01/02/2018

In Farrell v Farm Bureau Insurance (Unpublished, November 28, 2017, Docket No. 335979), the Michigan Court of Appeals highlighted the difference between a named insured’s claim for no‑fault benefits and a claim made pursuant to statute. The Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that no-fault claims made pursuant to statute are not governed or controlled by any contractual agreement and, therefore, Bahri v IDS Property Cas. Ins. Co., 308 Mich App 420 (2014) does not set forth the appropriate standard for determining if a claim should be barred for fraud or material misrepresentation.

To access the full article:

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Margaret Scott, Appointed as Vice Chair of the Oakland County Bar Association’s Criminal Law Committee
In The News 06/29/2018

Secrest Wardle Attorneys, Jim Bradley and Drew Broaddus, Author Negligence Law Article in Michigan Bar Journal
In The News 06/25/2018

Secrest Wardle Executive Partner, Sarah L. Walburn, Authors Chapter in ICLE Damages Handbook
In The News 05/02/2018

Announcing the April 2018 Episode of Secrest Wardle's MI PIP Monthly
In The News 04/23/2018

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Lindsay D. Schmidt to Troy Location
In The News 04/02/2018

Click Here For All Press Releases

Dude, That’s Your Car: “Ownership” is Determined by Right to Use Vehicle and Not Actual Use of Vehicle
No-Fault Newsline 07/16/2018

Michigan Court of Appeals Considers Parent’s Failure to Supervise and Declares Open and Obvious Does Not Apply to Children Under 7-Years Old
Amusement and Leisure 07/12/2018

Awash in PIP Benefits: Court of Appeals Rules that Parked Vehicle Exclusion Does Not Apply to Fall Sustained While Hand-Washing Vehicle (Maintenance)
No-Fault Newsline 07/02/2018

In the Eye of the Beholder: COA holds that lack of graspable handrail on staircase was open and obvious condition, and that artwork falling from wall did not cause slip and fall incident
Boundaries 06/21/2018

Does a landlord out of possession have a duty to inspect the premises? Court of Appeals says “Yes”
Boundaries 06/15/2018

View All Publications