There Is a Difference: No-Fault Insured Claim vs. Statutory Claim
No-Fault Newsline 01/02/2018

In Farrell v Farm Bureau Insurance (Unpublished, November 28, 2017, Docket No. 335979), the Michigan Court of Appeals highlighted the difference between a named insured’s claim for no‑fault benefits and a claim made pursuant to statute. The Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that no-fault claims made pursuant to statute are not governed or controlled by any contractual agreement and, therefore, Bahri v IDS Property Cas. Ins. Co., 308 Mich App 420 (2014) does not set forth the appropriate standard for determining if a claim should be barred for fraud or material misrepresentation.

To access the full article:

Announcing the Next Episode of Secrest Wardle's "MI PIP Monthly"
In The News 01/11/2018

Secrest Wardle Supports 23rd Annual Holiday Food & Gift Drive Sponsored by Troy Police Department & Alliance Mobile Health
In The News 12/27/2017

Secrest Wardle Partner Renee T. Townsend Honored at Michigan Lawyers Weekly 2017 “Up & Coming Lawyers” Awards Celebration
In The News 12/22/2017

Secrest Wardle Welcomes Associate Brett P. Windecker to Troy Location
In The News 12/19/2017

Secrest Wardle Supports Grand Rapids Area Girls Choral Academy at “Let Their Voice Be Heard” Event
In The News 12/07/2017

Click Here For All Press Releases

Michigan Court of Appeals Gives Lump of Coal to Holiday Event Attendee
Boundaries 01/18/2018

Employees Only: Utilizing Employee Exit Does Not Make Black Ice Effectively Unavoidable
Boundaries 01/17/2018

Innocence Lost: Court of Appeals Upholds Insurer’s Right to Deny PIP Benefits to Innocent Third Parties
No-Fault Newsline 01/17/2018

Time Bomb: Federal Appeals Court Holds Six-Year Limitations Period Applies for Statutory Based Claim for Payment of Penalty Interest
Safeguards 01/15/2018

What’s That Smell: Court of Appeals Affirms Strict Requirements of Res Ipsa Loquitur
State of the Art 01/09/2018

View All Publications